You are NEVER hooked in.

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9150
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

I'm really anti gadget on this issue - for reasons that have been beaten to death over the decades...

- Extra procedures and disciplines are required which outweigh the procedures and disciplines required to launch safely hooked in.

- They're not bulletproof.

- Batteries die.

- Nag alarms get turned off.

- Warning lights can't be seen in bright sunlight.

- The disruption that's most likely to put you at launch with a dangling carabiner is the same one that's gonna neutralize the effectiveness of your gadget.

- They're invariably used as further excuses to skip hook-in checks and kill the message.

Took a quick look at some the gadgets that kidsandcars are pushing and, gotta admit, some of them are pretty impressive - CAREseat in particular. Pretty bulletproof, minimal hassle, redundancy, no real downsides per se.

But probably a little pricey, not currently commercially available, dependent upon some of the intelligence only existing in modern cars.

My thoughts are that unless something like this were made mandatory - and that day may come but don't hold your breath - the kind of person who'd be most likely to install one of these things would be the kind of person least likely to need it. Also that as well thought out, designed, engineered, manufactured as one of these things may be it MUST NOT be allowed to become an excuse to not "look before you lock".

It's amazing that as widespread and mainstream as this issue is (44 dead US kids last year, 17 so far this) and as many people as there are doing work - much of it good - on solutions that nobody's really nailed the message: ASSUME the kid's in the car every time you're about to slam the door shut.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9150
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.rmhpa.org/messageboard/viewtopic.php?t=3029
HOOK IN
BJ Herring - 2010/05/01 19:15

This still gets me.
This still gets lotsa people - thanks entirely to stupid pigfuckers like the ones that totally infest your vile little club.
The Aussie method is very popular on the internet forums where they hook the harness to the hang glider as part of the pre-flight and never unhook it.
It's EXTREMELY popular an the internet forums...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=13359
Today was a bad day!
Mike Bomstad - 2009/08/26 04:21:15 UTC

The harness is part of the aircraft... end of story.
(Just because it's easy to remove, does not mean it should be. Dont choose the path of least resistance)

Attach it to the wing, completing the aircraft.... then preflight the completed aircraft.
Buckle yourself into the cockpit and then your ready.
...because...

15-00825
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7387/10125512503_2fc2445a42_o.png
Image
11-A12819
http://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8339/28924980016_2ba1d20ef7_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8253/28924975726_0d24a615c2_o.png
13-A14319

...those are the only places in which it actually works.
Here, we seem to do well by making a hang-check as a mandatory part of the routine.
1. You fuckin' douchebags would SEEM to do well by only using white webbing for backup loops 'cause unhooked launches tend to be once in every five hundred cycles events. ANYTHING you decide to do or not do will SEEM to work well.

If you rub a little peanut butter on your ankles in the morning that'll SEEM to work really well for protection against rattlesnake bite. It won't actually DO anything - but all you fuckin' morons with brains the sizes of walnuts will be feeling bulletproof by the time you've gotten half your battens stuffed. And you'll start making rubbing peanut butter on your ankles mandatory for all your local sites - spring, summer, fall, and winter. (Works best in the winter.)

2. Who's made hang checks mandatory parts of your routines? What's your punishment for people who don't do hang checks? You see somebody about to launch unhooked you only stop him if you saw him doing a hang check five or ten minutes prior?

3. I don't know when the last time you read the fuckin' SOPs was - or even if they're anywhere in the ballpark of your comprehension level - but here's what's MANDATORY:
With each flight, demonstrates a method of establishing that the pilot is hooked in just prior to launch.
But none of you pieces of shit will DO IT - 'cause Tom Galvin has warned you all that complying with USHGA regulations will give you a false sense of security.
Whatever it is, we just want to do it every single time.
Try a little peanut butter on your forehead just before you put your helmet on. It's been working perfectly for snakebite so far, right? I one hundred percent guarantee you it'll seem to work perfectly for preventing unhooked launches for a long time as well. And if it misses once and you survive, just try using more peanut butter.
This is my reminder (publicly) to focus...
Image
...on the basic pre-flight and a solid hang-check every time I fly.
GOOD. I *SO* hope to read a report of one of you motherfuckers getting splattered all over the base of Lookout. That'll help.
It's dead. That's Kunio...

Image

...obviously.
PS. When I say hang check, even if it's just a self guided step forward to look back and inspect the hang strap being straight and happy.
1. That's not a HANG check. You're not HANGING. That's a WALK-THROUGH.

2. Why does the fuckin' strap need to be straight and happy? How badly would Kunio have been killed if his strap had been twisted, knotted, and frayed halfway through?
If that ever gets to be something that falls by the way-side when it's uber soarable, or when I'm gabbing to someone... I've told myself I'll stop flying.
Nah. Keep doing your mandatory hang checks in the setup area. Please don't EVER stop flying - or START adhering to USHGA's hook-in check requirement.
And that's a motivator to do it right.
Right. What happened to Kunio in front of his wife and little girls won't really work for you. But the thought of the horror of a self imposed lifetime grounding... Now THAT'S something that'll really get you FOCUSED on doing things right.
Whatever we have to do.
Anything but the right thing - asshole.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9150
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.rmhpa.org/messageboard/viewtopic.php?t=3029
HOOK IN
Allen Sparks - 2010/05/05 05:19

Another tragedy is the story of Bill Priday who launched unhooked at Hensons Gap during the Team Challenge.
It wasn't at Henson or DURING the Team Challenge. It was at Whitwell and it was the first (and last) wind dummy flight before what was supposed to have been the first round of the first day.
I had met him just a week before and we had a great jam session around the camp fire.
TWO weeks before at the McConnellsburg fly-in - right after he'd been intercepted at the back of the south ramp with his carabiner dangling.
These sad events are a stark reminder to me of how lucky I am to be here with the living.
Those Rocky Mountain assholes? Not entirely sure how I'd react to that.
In 1976 I launched unhooked on a windy assisted cliff launch...
Doesn't sound like you were assisted all that well.
...and miraculously survived unscathed.
And in 1981 USHGA instituted a hook-in check requirement regulation which you and everybody else chose to totally ignore. And for over a dozen years after that Doug Hildreth was pleading for people to adhere to it. And you ignored him too. And maybe if you'd had a long talk about hook-in checks with Bill instead of a jam session he'd have been able to continue flying gliders and having jam sessions around campfires beyond the two weeks he had left as things were. That's what I'd have done anyway. But I'm a really crappy guitar player.
I would not expect to survive another such event.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26557
Failure to hook in 6/29/12
Allen Sparks - 2012/07/13 12:41:24 UTC

As a USHPA observer, I will not sign off for a USHPA rating until the pilot has demonstrated that he is doing a hook-in check consistently, just prior to launch, on every flight I observe.
But you'll happily stand around doing NOTHING when I'm engaging your pieces o' shit Colorado buddies on this issue and Tom Galvin is sabotaging my efforts and the scum controlling that wire is banning me and deleting all of my posts. Big help.

So how many ratings have you signed off on people doing hook-in checks consistently? Can you refer us to any of their videos so's we can watch what they're doing on launch. How come none of them lifted any more of a finger to back me than you did?
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
You're not a good man, Allen. Good men don't do that much nothing when that much evil is going on. You have a lot of things to make up for in your and our history and you're not really doing shit.
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. - Winston Churchill
Tim Meehan - 2010/05/05 14:05
Arvada

I wonder if we can get JY to share his "Lookout-Unhooked, Unplugged, and Unhinged, robo-RC HG" story on MTV.

I was there. Saw the whole thing. Luckily no one hurt and it was a beautiful sight. JY has to tell it though.

Setting the stage: "It was a perfect Lookout glass-off evening. Back in the day. Back when they happened every single night and the year-round temperature never varied above 79-degrees or below 58..."

Pick it up from there, JY...
John Wilber - 2010/05/05 18:36
Littleton

1988. I launched from Fort Funston with no leg loops...
Thank you. Tells me everything I need to know.
That will give you a little surge of adrenalin.
I'll hafta take your word for it. I wouldn't know.
Once I got proned out and manged not to land (crash) in the ocean, and quit shaking, I flew around for a while trying to figure out how to land while hanging from the down tubes, or staying mostly prone. Broke a down tube.
Sounds like you opted for hanging from the downtubes. Gotta love the consistency.
Why did this happen?
'Cause you're a total fuckin' moron. 'Cause even in strong glassy coastal air where all you hafta do is allow the glider to float up to verify your connection and leg loops...

13-10921
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3911/14720992956_ed594708b3_o.png
Image

...you REFUSE to do it.
A really pretty woffo was asking questions, and I was showing off.
Bullshit. See above about you being a total fucking moron. Ditto for anyone and everyone you know who's on speaking terms with you.
John Wilber - 42029 - H4 - 1988/09/12 - Bob Faris - AT FL FSL RLF TUR XC
Congratulations on your rating.
Jim Yocom - 2010/05/05 21:55
Golden

Stupid
We went way south of stupid eons ago, Jim.
Most have already heard it, but for the benefit of newbies...
We've been hearing it since the Seventies.
I was ready to fly, but amazingly the conditions kept changing - so unusual for Lookout ;). A couple times I walked to launch, only to wait and then go back to the set up area. Finally a woofo...
Wuffo. As in "What for?" See if you can figure out how to fuck up the spelling and pronunciation a little more.
...hiked up to launch and started asking me question after question.
I so do hope he was able to get to someone who knew what the fuck he was talking about later.
I moved my glider to launch and the questions continued.
Angle of Attack
- How far the nose is pointed up.
Carabineer
- What we use to hook ourselves in.
Hang check
- What we use to make sure we're hooked in.
Just prior
- Fifteen to thirty minutes. Or whatever. Whichever figure is larger.
Backup loop
- What we use to stay attached to the glider after our main breaks.
Spreader
- What we use to keep our carabineers from being crushed by the compression of the suspension webbing.
Downtubes
- Where we put our hands to get the extra control we need for landing.
LZ
- A narrow dry riverbed with large rocks strewn all over the place.
Wheels
- What girls and faggots who haven't perfected their flare timing sometimes need to keep from being injured on landing.
Spiral fracture of the humerus
- Most common hang gliding injury.
Three point bridal
- Splits the tow pressure between the pilot and glider.
Release
- What we always have within easy reach.
Weak link
- What we use to prevent lockouts, get off tow in emergencies, generally increase the safety of the towing operation.
Hook knife
- What we use to cut ourselves off tow when our releases and weak links don't work.
Inconvenience
- Any thing that happens after a weak link break.
Bobby Bailey
- Fucking genius when it comes to this shit.
Twisted agenda
- Any attempt to lower the hang gliding fatality rate below the standard of one participant per thousand per year.
Wuffo
- Anyone interested in hang gliding. Frequently used as a scapegoat to cover for the incompetence of competent pilots.
Finally, just as he ran out of questions and was walking away, a nice cycle came through launch. At last I was to escape the drone of questioning and be free in the air.
Extraordinarily free.
I did a nice walk, jog, run and the glider began flying, rising up as my hands slid down the control frame. I pulled down on the frame, but at the same time thought this is not right, the glider was not lifting me - I must be unhooked.
People who DO have fuckin' clues what they're doing and DON'T have total shit for brains lift the glider up BEFORE starting nice walks, jogs, and runs.
I immediately shoved the glider forward into the air...
Not interested. Don't give flying fucks what total douchebags who can't be bothered to follow rules, do hook-in checks do after the launch unhooked or what happens to them.
...which put me square on my rear 1/2 way down launch.
Too bad you didn't hold on long enough to get far enough away from the slope to kill yourself.
I sat watching my Wills Wing Ram Air fly away from the hill and make a gentle turn to the left. I was relieved it turned away from the houses below where it might hit someone. The glider continued to turn, making 2 complete 360s, gaining about 50ft. Once over launch, it straightened out disappearing over the back. Several PG pilots and I ran back to find the glider upright in a bush with nary a scratch. MR. joked it was the best flight that glider ever made. Probably true - I never flew that Ram Air very well!
You should've had your rating revoked. Ditto for the asshole who signed you off.
Moral of the story is to have a launch procedure/checklist that you complete every time.
Oh good. Yet another shitheaded unhooked launcher is gonna tell his fellow shitheads the best way to prevent unhooked launches.
If you are interrupted, start over.
Focus on the really important stuff. Make sure all of your safety rings are in place. So many needless deaths we could prevent if only people would be more conscientious about that.
Just like setting up and preflighting, you need a procedure that you never vary.
And that procedure must NEVER include the one addressing this particular issue and included in the One through Four rating requirements.
I never thought it would happen to me...
Of course you didn't. We've already established that you've got total shit for brains. Hopefully your wuffo realized that and flushed everything you told him about hang gliding out of his system.
...but it did, so it could happen to you.
OF COURSE IT COULD! It happened to BOTH you and Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney! What chance could any of us muppet hook-in checkers possibly have?
I am happy to report it has not happened again and I intend to keep it that way.
And I'm so extraordinarily happy to see you continuing with the precise same game plan and expecting different results. Gives me a tiny bit of hope for the gene pool.
Tim Meehan - 2010/05/05 23:59

And at the annual holiday banquet that year, JY was awarded a really cool and gigantically oversized RC controller. Looked like a giant boom box with joysticks and an antenna.

Thems was the days...
On 2014/02/11 Jon Orders got a felony criminal negligence conviction and was sentenced to five months in jail for making the same mistake. Glad you Colorado dickheads were able to have so much fun with this one.
For myself...
Because, of course, rules don't apply to you individually.
...I always take a moment just before I connect the passenger to take one-more-look at the gear. Make sure everything is still connected and connected properly. Take a deep breath. Focus. Check every attachment point one_more_time.
Oh! And after you've checked YOUR connection you're done, good to go. Just hook your passenger in whenever the fuck you feel like it, don't check, assume HER connection is fine, run off the mountain whenever.
Last thing I want are the words "wasn't paying attention," engraved on my headstone. Posthumous reputation is a preventative motivating factor.
No mention of HER headstone, of course. And statistically when someone dies in an unhooked tandem incident it's the passenger. VERY telling. Fuckin' sociopath.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9150
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoGv_5uGdNo
7-6-12 Mansfield encampment (a day in the life) 77 mile
Mike Bomstad - 2012/07/19

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoGv_5uGdNo


Little pre flight footage on the rig. Doesn't get much better!
No Mike, not in the context of THIS:

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=13359
Today was a bad day!
Mike Bomstad - 2009/08/26 04:21:15 UTC

The harness is part of the aircraft... end of story.
(Just because it's easy to remove, does not mean it should be. Dont choose the path of least resistance)

Attach it to the wing, completing the aircraft.... then preflight the completed aircraft.
Buckle yourself into the cockpit and then your ready.
crap anyway.

01-00109
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7373/10125406156_9be0f07e48_o.png
Image
04-00314
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3860/14563846090_f480f77a16_o.png
Image
08-00615
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5528/10125343855_f19be91813_o.png
Image
09-00625
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5507/10125361495_7796762f6e_o.png
Image
15-00825
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7387/10125512503_2fc2445a42_o.png
Image
16-00901
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51151093589_ffba27fabd_o.png
Image
Oh, I guess we should hook you in. Unless you just wanna lay down and look stupid for the camera.
17-00908
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2888/10125522393_17527caef6_o.png
Image

He looked stupid when the camera started rolling. Hard for anybody as off the scale stupid as Mike is not to.

Rigid wing glider, harness, helmet, parachute, instrument deck, platform launch rig, wing supports, retrieval chute. State of the art, high performance, high tech, beautifully engineered and constructed.

Chintzy dollar and a half two-string "release" "system" with the lanyard within easy reach. Total shit capacity but it's probably adequate to his surface tow equivalent of the Rooney Link he's undoubtedly using as a pitch and lockout protector.

26-01309
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5584/14564083687_d55a156208_o.png
Image
OK. Hooked up. Main and backup. Carabiner locked.
Good thing you got that backup and have the carabiner locked - speaking of stupidity.
Attach it to the wing, completing the aircraft.... then preflight the completed aircraft.
Buckle yourself into the cockpit and then your ready.
He's already buckled into the "cockpit" and he hasn't completed the aircraft OR preflighted the most critical connection of the assembly. He's assuming he's hooked in and that the connection doesn't look like THIS:

Image

The vast majority of unhooked launches result in nothing more than bruising, glider damage, and embarrassment. Statistically you're WAY better off launching unhooked than you are separating from your glider when the flight's underway. You should NEVER prone out under a glider - whether it's for a totally stupid hang check or a totally nonstupid platform or dolly launch - until you've seen your carabiner close and/or heard it click. Even if the consequences can be no worse than looking stupid you don't go down until you've made that check. It's a helluva lot easier and more effective to preflight that connection while you're standing up and turned around than it is while you're hanging and trying to roll, turn your head, and look back up to where you were a few seconds ago.

And what's the point of doing a hang check prior to the launch sequence on a platform or dolly launch? You WILL be doing a hang check before things start moving. What's the use of cluttering the preflight checks and activities with a totally useless copy of something that's gonna happen anyway whether you want it to or not?

39-03907
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7331/10131590485_674e29d8d0_o.png
Image
41-04507
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3854/14770389053_e14f6baa9b_o.png
Image
53-21001
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3872/14748178404_47d5f8b3cb_o.png
Image
55-21213
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3901/14748177644_16c2fec68e_o.png
Image
56-21708
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5569/14750519515_b952fb1d94_o.png
Image
57-21902
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3861/14770386013_7c72d81830_o.png
Image
60-30409
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7429/10125481866_6ffc1a031a_o.png
Image
61-31804
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5581/14563871678_e3a7042f5a_o.png
Image
62-31805
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3862/14564078777_5661be9825_o.png
Image

You are one year, one month, and eighteen days away from coming within one very lucky break of going off HERE:

39-B14607
http://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8126/28852425302_d70604f440_o.png
Image

with your carabiner dangling.

11-A12819
http://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8339/28924980016_2ba1d20ef7_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8253/28924975726_0d24a615c2_o.png
13-A14319

COMPLETE DISBELIEF! How could something like this POSSIBLY happen? To me? Again? Twice in a period of under fourteen months? I mean, I keep doing the same thing over and over... Surely I should be getting better results. :?

People from the extremes of the popularity range, from T** at K*** S****** on up to Rob Friend-Of-Every-Pilot-He-Meets Kells have been saying this for decades - ever since the moronic Aussie Method first reared its ugly head: Conditioning yourself to think that any time you're in a harness and under a glider there's no chance that you're not safely connected to it...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18695
How could this accident happen?
William Olive - 2010/01/28 04:50:53 UTC

Phil Beck did this twice (or was that three times?) in a day at Hexham (Victoria) one time while foot launch aerotow testing gliders. Of course, with a swag of gliders to test fly, Phil would unclip from the glider he'd just landed, then clip into the next one to be tested.

Except, at least twice, he didn't clip in.
...is a monumentally bad idea.

Keep up the great work, Mike. So far it's just been a bit o' inconvenience but with just a little more effort and luck you could become to the Aussie Method what Zack Marzec became to the standard aerotow weak link.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9150
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Hey potential baby roasters (anybody and everybody who has a baby, ever transports him in something resembling a car, lives south of Point Barrow and north of Elephant Island)...

I didn't express things very well with THIS:
Tad Eareckson - 2014/07/24 14:15:53 UTC

I can't say that the lift and tug procedure of which I'm the primary proponent prevents unhooked launches. But that's only 'cause people who practice lift and tug are scared shitless of launching unhooked at the only time it counts. And I CAN say lift and tuggers and reasonable facsimiles are the only classes of foot launchers who never launch unhooked. ALL others use bullshit checklists, procedures, routines, "BE SAFE" equivalents and drop like freakin' flies.
Forget the fact that lift and tuggers and reasonable facsimiles are the only classes of foot launchers who never launch unhooked. Not launching unhooked shouldn't really be the goal here. The REAL goal is to NEVER miss or fuck up the final two seconds procedure you've adopted to guard against launching unhooked. Not launching unhooked is just a side effect of how effectively you implement your procedure.

If your procedure is to:

http://www.kidsandcars.org/userfiles/store/look-before-you-lock-en-sp.pdf
...open the back door of your car every time you park to check that no one has been left behind.
then fuck you and your kid. You're both blights on the gene pool and the planet can't survive your presence on it.

If, however, your procedure is:
LOOK BEFORE YOU LOCK
then stay tuned.

Forget the fact that your baby's alive, well, safe, and happy at day care at noon. If you weren't scared shitless you were gonna roast your baby AND/OR failed to check the back BEFORE slamming your door, for the purpose of the exercise you roasted your baby. And the only responsible thing to do at that point is have him adopted by people WITH functional brains that evening.

And I one hundred percent guarantee you that there are untold hundreds of parents and exparents who would sell their souls in a heartbeat to be able to go back in time and do exactly that.

The lift and tuggers and reasonable facsimiles are one hundred percent effective because they're ALWAYS scared shitless they're about to fuck up AND...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=13359
Today was a bad day!
Mike Bomstad - 2009/08/26 04:21:15 UTC

The harness is part of the aircraft... end of story.
(Just because it's easy to remove, does not mean it should be. Dont choose the path of least resistance)
...they choose and follow the path of least resistance:

13-03110
http://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3697/13700915564_87a2a336b0_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2912/13700562685_86575e9220_o.png
14-03129

...to verify that they're not.

These Kids And Cars idiots are throwing out all kinds of crap that anyone with a functional brain KNOWS *WILL* FAIL a huge percentage of the time. And ONE check failure is WAY too many.

This total fucking moron:

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7387/10125512503_2fc2445a42_o.png
Image

is in the process of watching the catastrophic failure of a critical check he's been using his entire career to keep his stupid ass alive. Red lights should be flashing and alarm bells should be deafening. But... big fuckin' deal. He's as totally unfazed by what's happening as he has been by hundreds of warnings from people with functional brains that this is an extremely dangerous and counterproductive strategy and the incident reports...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18695
How could this accident happen?
William Olive - 2010/01/28 04:50:53 UTC

Phil Beck did this twice (or was that three times?) in a day at Hexham (Victoria) one time while foot launch aerotow testing gliders. Of course, with a swag of gliders to test fly, Phil would unclip from the glider he'd just landed, then clip into the next one to be tested.

Except, at least twice, he didn't clip in.
...vividly illustrating EXACTLY what they're saying.

11-A12819
http://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8339/28924980016_2ba1d20ef7_o.png
Image

WTF!!! Two plus two can sometimes equal FOUR? SHIT!!!!!!!

13-A14319
http://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8253/28924975726_0d24a615c2_o.png
Image

Complete disbelief! Everybody knows it really equals SIX! Oh well, I'll just run the equation next weekend and I'm sure I'll be getting six again. The chances I'll get four again are pretty microscopic - if you look at the track record I've racked up.

Use a mindset, strategy, procedure that results in four 100.0000 percent of the time - FOR THE *CHECK*. Anything under that you need to go back and REALLY check your arithmetic. And don't be the LEAST bit reassured by your perfect track record of not ever having roasted a baby.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9150
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=13359
Today was a bad day!
Rob McKenzie - 2009/08/26 17:26:12 UTC

I hesitate to even post.
If I too had a brain the size of a walnut I TOO would be very hesitant to "EVEN" post.
I have no intention to sway anyone to do what I do...
Then fuck you and the horse you rode in on. We're talking about a serious life and death issue that's resulted in an immeasurable amount of pain and suffering for direct victims - pilots and passengers - and friends and families. And the unhooked launch death of Lenami Godinez-Avila thirty-two months and two days following your despicable post will be the single event that will bring over a hundred times more global attention to the sport of hang gliding than whatever the hell the runner up has scored.
...but will post only under the premise of FWIW.
We already know it's worth shit - as are you. NOBODY who gives a flying fuck about the sport and its participants comes into a discussion with bullshit like:
- hesitate to even post
- post ONLY under the PREMISE of FWIW
I've got a hundred times the respect for Robert Seckold that I do for you 'cause - even though he was a low double digit IQ Aussie Methodist incapable of grasping the concept of a hook-in check or recognizing any possible value in ever doing one - he was at least genuinely concerned about the issue of people launching unhooked and passionate about what he genuinely believed was the solution.
I believe that if I fly long enough, numbers lead to an eventual failure to hook in. I'm human.
And a dice roller. Fuck you.

I know I'm human and pretty much guaranteed to launch unhooked if I ever start believing either that I'm unlikely to launch unhooked or willing to accept a one in a billion chance of launching unhooked as an inevitable cost of doing business. So I'm ALWAYS scared shitless I'm about to do it on EVERY foot launch. And that fear NEVER diminishes. And thus there's ZERO chance that I - or anyone else who has or adopts that strategy - will do it.
I do a hang check before nearly every flight.
Yeah, so did Kunio. He left the sport with an absolutely outstanding track record.
I do it without needing a nose or keel assist as I balance my weight over the basetube.
Good thing. Hard to imagine that anyone with any shred of decency would feel like helping you out with ANYTHING.
I'm more likely to do a hang check if I don't need to trouble others for help.
13-03110
http://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3697/13700915564_87a2a336b0_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2912/13700562685_86575e9220_o.png
14-03129

Fuckin' asshole.
I probably miss the hang check about 1 in 1000 flights.
And here's what Mike Barber has to say about one in a thousand odds:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tj1Z_BI5OXs
Mike Barber - 2007/12/25

I don't risk safety any more. I'd say... the absolute hardest I would push it is on a thousand to one chance of getting hurt - and that's pushing VERY hard. It's pushing it TOO hard. Because, I do this more than a thousand times a year. You're really pushing the envelope at a thousand to one chance of getting hurt. It should be more like one in a HUNDRED thousand - which is probably the same as driving your car.
I feel leg loops...
So does Eric Hinrichs - with a thousandth of the effort and time commitment that you do with your idiot unassisted hang check bullshit.
...and look for height above basetube and twisting in lines during the hang check.
Who the fuck cares? What does any of that bullshit have anything to do with anything worth talking about?
I have twice in the last 10,000 or so flights actually laid on the ground unhooked while doing my self hang check. So numbers indicate about 1 in 5000 chance of forgetting to hook in.
For YOU - who's the only person you give a rat's ass about.

This is your job, you do it all the time, and 99.9 percent of your flying is with extremely familiar equipment at the same handful of sites after the same daily preps that are so routine you could do them sleepwalking. So how 'bout REAL world people who do this recreationally a couple dozen times a year, go on road trips to fly-ins and comps, move up the equipment ladder at pretty fast paces, have to figure out how to make new gadgets work, help friends with similar issues, deal shuttling and retrieval issues, herd and feed dogs and kids?
Multiply rate of failure to hook in by failure to hang check and I have perhaps a 1 in 5 million chance of launching unhooked.
That's not MUCH hope but I'll take what I can get.
With 500 flights a year...
...an average of 1.37 flights per day...
...I have therefore about 1 failed hookin launch every 50,000 years.
Hear that - all you other people who average 1.37 flights a day in environments and routines similar to Rob's? You've got virtually NOTHING to worry about! Once every five thousand years you're gonna get your head taken off by a meteorite so this is essentially a nonissue. So let's forget about it and get back to perfecting your flare timing.

And make sure you don't look around and see what's going on with a very solid percentage of your buddies doing the same kind of flying you do at similar frequencies who've adopted the same kinda stupid bullshit mindsets, strategies, procedures that this total douchebag is selling.

And also make sure you don't look at any of the disaster case studies in which the distraction or brain lapse that takes out the action of hooking in is what also takes out the preflight check you're using to confirm that you're hooked in.

And watch Ryan Voight here pulling loops:

http://vimeo.com/26210217


Smooth, flawless, beautiful! Zilch chance that he's ever gonna blow the glider or tumble. Therefore, obviously, YOU TOO will have zilch chances of blowing a loop and blowing the glider or tumbling!
But it could be my next launch attempt.
But, again, statistically you'll have had your head taken off by a meteorite about five hours prior so it's just plain stupid to be concerned about that.

Me, Rob? I'm COUNTING ON being standing at the edge of the ramp with my carabiner dangling two seconds before my next launch attempt. I really can't imagine any other scenario. If I could I'd be scared much less shitless as I am as things are. And the absolute scariest thing I can think of is standing at the edge of a ramp two seconds before a launch attempt not being scared shitless that my carabiner was dangling.
I like variety.
And this is all about what seems to work for YOU and what YOU like. And doesn't have shit to do with anybody else.
Sometimes AUSSIE and sometimes not.
Just like Mike End-Of-Story Bomstad. Sometimes the third wire...

http://thetension.blogspot.com/2007_07_15_archive.html
Image

...sometimes the first, second, or fourth. Anything to relieve the mind numbing monotony of always trying to execute procedures and tasks the same tedious way.

And when I've committed to launch sometimes I level the wings, hold the nose down, wait for a good straight in puff, thrust off hard... Sometimes I try other stuff.
It helps to bring the thought process alive.
REALLY...

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3873/14559992972_97b1a2a525_o.png
Image
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3900/14557433291_0d22597fd6_o.png
Image
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2926/14374222698_ed4d1c396d_o.png
Image
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5590/14374149620_03c742c998_o.png
Image

...bring it alive!
Routine leads to boredom...
And finely honed...

Image

...peak proficiency.
...which leads to reactive thinking...
As illustrated by stuff like THIS?:

http://www.newscientist.com/articleimages/dn8186/0-falcon-divebombing-starlings-wins-top-photo-prize.html
Image
http://www.newscientist.com/data/images/ns/cms/dn8186/dn8186-1_700.jpg[/img]
...which IMO...
Oh good. Another OPINION. Hard to imagine where hang gliding would be without the wealth of OPINIONS it has constantly being pulled out of asses and streaming in.
...is a poor facsimile of true thinking.
1. So what's a GOOD "facsimile" of true thinking? The kind of rot you're spewing out?

2. So Jon Orders has probably just finished up five months in jail for dropping an unhooked passenger a thousand feet. He was trained and certified under a protocol that allowed for ZILCH variety or facsimiles of true thinking. So where were your letters to Jon, his lawyer, the court, the press, PAC explaining how he'd been set up for inevitable failure? How 'bout your article in the magazine?

3. Lemme tell ya sumpin', asshole...

NEVER in the entire history of hang gliding has there been a long term instructor capable of TRUE THINKING. If there had been there'd have never been such things as:
- backup loops
- locking carabiners
- floating crossbars
- foot landing requirements
- traffic cones
- spiral fractures of the humerus
- narrow dry riverbed with large rocks strewn all over the place landing options
- tandem training
- sidewire failures
- center of mass tow bridles
- pro tow bridles
- releases within easy reach
- backup releases
- Linknives
- Birrenators
- 130 pound test pitch and lockout preventers
- Ryan Rooney instant hands free releases
- tow mast breakaway protectors
- the Cone of Safety
- the Aussie Method
- "Hook In!" plaques
- unhooked launches
- forum moderators
- Davis Straub
- opinions

4. So you've been doing all this "true thinking", right?

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6342
The view from the other end of the rope
Jim Rooney - 2014/07/26 03:21:47 UTC

I thought of something else today. (I get a lot of time to think)...
The kind of true thinking that leads to a 0.1 percent failure in the most critical of the checks of prior to commitment - a rate that would max out a REAL aviation career at somewhere between one and a thousand flights. So tell me how all this extra true thinking you've been doing has benefitted to sport of hang gliding. If you'd had your head taken off by a meteorite forty years ago what would we now be missing? Who'd now be alive and well instead of toast?

5. How 'bout giving us some other examples of the benefits "true thinking" in this game we play? If "true thinking" is such an important edge in hang gliding how come there's not a four month old pinheaded Turkey Vulture on the planet that can't kick our asses in anything and everything we do blindfolded with a third of its primaries snipped off?

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Davis Straub - 2011/08/28 15:26:28 UTC

Then again, Russell Brown had us double up behind him after six breaks in a row at Zapata. We couldn't figure out why we had so many breaks so quickly. Maybe just coincidence.
When was the last time you heard about a Turkey Vulture repeatedly trying to land on dead quarter inch twigs, repeatedly snapping them, and appearing totally baffled by what was going on? "I can't figure out why I've had so many breaks so quickly. Maybe just coincidence."

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25015
Zippy pounds in
Davis Straub - 2011/09/02 18:37:09 UTC

Concussions are in fact very serious and have life long effects. The last time I was knocked out what in 9th grade football. I have felt the effects of that ever since. It changes your wiring.
6. A launch ramp is THE ABSOLUTE *LAST* PLACE that you wanna be doing "true thinking" - or any other superfluous distracting CRAP like checking your chin strap, bar clearance, or backup loop or making sure your suspension isn't twisted. You're about to do THIS:

09-05019
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2928/13891086719_3ba7e65d38_o.png
Image

you wanna make goddam sure you don't do THIS:

2-112
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7600/28811055456_925c8abb66_o.png
Image

so you do THIS:

14-03129
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2912/13700562685_86575e9220_o.png
Image

That's reactive thinking at its finest. You wanna do any facsimiles of TRUE thinking above and beyond that you be my guest. I totally encourage you to. One more dickheaded instructor I won't hafta deal with anymore and can honor with a Darwin Award and use as a cautionary tale.

There's one best place for that Peregrine to be to connect with a Starling. And there's one best place for the most vulnerable Starlings to be in order to minimize the chances of being connected with. And every goddam last one of them is doing his utmost to get there.

http://ceredigionbirds33.blogspot.com/2012_03_01_archive.html
Image

That's also reactive thinking at its finest and exactly how things work on dogfights and XC comps. "True thinking" is a great place for the drawing board - which, by the way, is where you don't do any. It has ZERO place between the setup and breakdown areas and I DEFY you to cite a sane example.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9150
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/10.48
Not hooking in at the coast
Davis Straub - 2006/03/01 15:45:17 UTC

These kind of accidents keep happening
Yeah Davis...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18695
How could this accident happen?
Davis Straub - 2010/01/28 06:10:17 UTC

I have tried to launch unhooked on aerotow and scooter tow.
We've got all these total fuckin' douchebags doing and telling other total fuckin' douchebags to keep doing the same things over and over and, go figure, these kinds of ACCIDENTS keep happening.
Ben Hull-Bailey writes to a public forum...
Which public forum?
No doubt news is starting to trickle down to people of Sam'a accident...
Sam's what? These things aren't ACCIDENTS, motherfucker. This is natural selection operating at its best.
...while flying in Lanzarote this week so I'll fill in a few gaps with the official version...
1. How 'bout filling in the gaps with the UNofficial version. I find those to be adulterated with much less in the way of lies and bullshit.
2. Make sure you don't tell us his last name.
Sam was flying a Magic Kiss on the Famara cliffs on Feb 26th where he top landed to sort out an uncomfortable harness.
If he'd just taken it off and left it at launch and monkey barred he'd have had a much longer and more enjoyable flight.
He landed a long way back because of the cliff-like profile at T/O and unclipped for the long walk forward.
Good thing he held his glider down on his shoulders the whole way. Much easier, much better positive positive control that way.
After sorting the harness problem he went to relaunch but hadn't clipped back in.
So? He's gonna do a hook-in check within a couple seconds of launch per usual, right? What's it matter whether or not he'd clipped back in?
As he launched, the glider lifted away from him as the ground fell away.
He's gonna be ridge soaring a glassy smooth coastal site...


Image

...he's not using crew, all the stupid motherfucker needs to do is ALLOW the glider to float up...

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3911/14720992956_ed594708b3_o.png
Image

...which would give him a more effective launch anyway...
He hung onto the base bar with one hand...
Cool. That's plenty enough to safely control the glider - as any tow pilot will be more than happy to tell you.
... and managed to get his other hand up but couldn't haul himself into the A-frame. He held on for as long as possible to give maximum ground clearance then threw his 'chute which separated him and the glider.
Oh well, that was bound to happen sooner or later anyway.
He impacted some way below take-off a few seconds later.
Too many seconds for a soft landing WITHOUT the parachute, to few seconds for a soft landing WITH the parachute. Ain't life a bitch sometimes?
The rescue helicopter hung around 30 mins while he was stabilised and he was airlifted.
I'da hovered around for thirty minutes watching him bleed to death. We get such better discussions about this issue when the motherfucker doesn't survive.
His injuries are a broken arm, broken shoulder blade, chipped pelvis and quite a nasty wound where he impacted with his hip. The doctors are satisfied he shouldn't have a complicated recovery and are mostly worried about any infection in his wound.
Guess there wasn't much point in checking for brain damage - given the obvious and hopeless pre-existing condition.
It goes without saying he's extremely lucky as very few survive that sort of incident on what is effectively a cliff take off. His appraisal of the whole affair was "what kind of tosser forgets to clip in?"
The kind who fly hang gliders. But the only people who actually launch unhooked are the off the scale stupid motherfuckers who refuse to do hook-in checks.
So it's clearly not affected his self-analytical personality.
Born an off the scale stupid motherfucker, knows it, totally cool with it.
We expect him home possibly on Wednesday 29th but more likely towards the weekend, depending on the Doctor's say so. He has his mobile with him in hospital and I'm sure would appreciate the odd text from some pilots.
He doesn't have any pilot friends and I wouldn't feel like talking to him even if you DID give us the contact info 'cause I know EXACTLY what his response would be. You bring these assholes back from the dead you're still not gonna be able to get them to do anything remotely resembling a hook-in check. But he'd get along great with Dan DeWeese, Greg Porter, Martin Apopot.
The incident report should make for interesting reading.
No. But we're never gonna see it anyway.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9150
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Jump to next post:
http://www.kitestrings.org/post6467.html#p6467

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=31706
Hook in!
Brad Barkley - 2014/08/16 00:26:12 UTC

Glad this guy was just flat-land towing. And no, it's not me....this was just a youtube find.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luZYnZ9pkds


Image
Hook in!
Yeah dude...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1166
Thoughts on responsibility...
Scott Wilkinson - 2005/10/05 14:10:56 UTC

We visited Steve Wendt yesterday, who was visibly choked up over Bill's death. For Steve, it all comes down to one thing: you've got to hook in. Period.
You sure got that right. You've GOT to HOOK IN! PERIOD! 'Cause if you don't then you won't be hooked in. It all comes down to that!

But, of course, you've been trained by:
Brad Barkley - 89857 - H3 - Steve Wendt - 2013/08/05 - AT FL PL ST 360 CL FSL TUR
the best of the best! He' exceptionally knowledgeable. Hell...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=17404
Aerotow barrel release - straight or curved pin?
Jim Rooney - 2010/05/31 01:53:13 UTC

BTW, Steve Wendt is exceptionally knowledgeable. Hell, he's the one that signed off my instructor rating.
He's the one who signed off Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney's rating!

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1238
NZ accident who was the pilot?
Lauren Tjaden - 2006/02/21

I thought I should post this since the phone keeps ringing with friends worried about Jim and wanting information. Here is what I know. Yes, the Jim in the article is OUR Jim, Jim Rooney. It was a tandem hang gliding accident, and it involved a power line. I have no more information about the accident itself. The passenger apparently was burned and is hospitalized, but is not seriously injured. Jim sustained a brain injury. He was and is heavily sedated, which means the doctors don't know and can't test for how serious the brain injury is. He is in critical but stable condition.
OUR Jim. Jim Rooney. The Jim in the article.

But a little of the credit for should go to:
H2 - 2012/03/19 - Daniel Zink
Matt Taber and Lockout Mountain Flight Park.
Glad this guy was just flat-land towing.
1. Gawd! The dumb sonuvabitch didn't hook in to the towline...

01-0000
- 01 - chronological order
- 00 - seconds
- 00 - frame (30 fps)

01-0000
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7364/14178960692_a94aaa1474_o.png
Image
02-0020
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5528/13994938960_fd86dab865_o.png
Image
03-0424
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7441/13994966507_e7987aba93_o.png
Image
04-0620
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7437/14178290611_8be7a9d363_o.png
Image
05-0802
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5075/14201714283_9edae77110_o.png
Image
06-0814
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7421/14181582464_7861f32fe4_o.png
Image
07-0918
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7430/13994927670_0a968f52f3_o.png
Image
08-1010
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5558/13994910469_6b75091907_o.png
Image
09-1014
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5535/14181575884_903ee7d816_o.png
Image
10-1017
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5032/14178277401_74d84ea95c_o.png
Image
11-1019
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5592/14201701593_5620e53d03_o.png
Image
12-1023
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2895/14158401936_a1a9bbb16e_o.png
Image
13-1203
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2901/14201697943_f7217de30b_o.png
Image
14-1308
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7454/13994943877_02174f2d7b_o.png
Image
15-1400
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5200/14201693903_2c985c9f0b_o.png
Image
16-2710
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7369/14181566545_f1db631d03_o.png
Image

either!

2. And I sure am glad this guy:

http://ozreport.com/forum/files/copy_2_of_imgp1239_197.jpg
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7220/13949046702_ccfa0fafab_o.png
Image
http://www.thekiteboarder.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/opener-532x800.jpg

was just flatland towing too! You can get really fucked up if you do something like this off a ramp.
Christopher Albers - 2014/08/16 00:41:48 UTC

Sounded like FLPHG, not a tow.
It was neither. Only the glider got airborne.
Can you imagine towing?
Don't have to:
Doug Hildreth - 1985/03

1984/05/07 - John Shook - 43 - Intermediate - Sesace, Arizona - Wills Wing Duck

Pilot with thirty to forty towing flights apparently hooked in only to the tow line and when he released at three hundred feet, pilot fell to his death.
He'd a been dragged in that scrub a bit! Ouch!
That's why you always use an appropriate weak link with a finished length of 1.5 inches or less. An appropriate weak link with a finished length of 1.5 inches or less will prevent you from being dragged.
michael170 - 2014/08/16 06:03:04 UTC

Always a joy to see another idiot doing a hook-in check a few seconds after launch. Image
It would be a much greater joy to see idiot Brad doing one a few seconds after launch at Whitwell.

09-05019
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2928/13891086719_3ba7e65d38_o.png
Image

Jump to top:
http://www.kitestrings.org/post6466.html#p6466
User avatar
<BS>
Posts: 419
Joined: 2014/08/01 22:09:56 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by <BS> »

A complicated launch technique and over all poor performance for a hand launch glider.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9150
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=31781
Another hang check lesson
Nic Welbourn - 2014/09/03 00:05:56 UTC
Canberra

One of ours...
One of YOURS, asshole.
...was VERY lucky...
Like I said.
...to not be eating from a straw since his incident last weekend.

Complacency seems to remain as our #1 enemy.
Bullshit. YOUR Number One is stupidity. And there is no Number Two. And Number One isn't fixable. Good luck.
Aside from that, I guess the lesson here again is to do a hang check before launching.
Yep...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T19GtqUnXDo


That's DEFINITELY the ticket here...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=22608
I made a scary mistake.

Really hard to go wrong with guessing the lesson here again is to do a hang check before launching.
If that's not possible, lift your glider to make your hang strap tight before launch (thus checking your connection with the glider)...
But ONLY, of course, if doing a hang check SOMETIME before launching isn't possible. If you lift your glider to make your hang strap tight before launch (thus checking your connection with the glider) you automatically get a false sense of security. And that's a MUCH nastier dragon than just complacency.
...he was rather lucky to not lose his face/body.
Life.
The glider is a write-off.

Youch!

http://vimeo.com/104899162
Post Reply