landing

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9149
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

One ends up with a pretty good eye for details when doing projects which require going through these videos frame by frame on Final Cut. When Andrea does the buzz by Ground Camera the latter appears and vanishes in the space of pretty much exactly half a second. I'd totally missed him on the normal viewings before pausing on one of the frames and... OH!!! :idea:

And something else occurred to me last night while composing the previous paragraph...

That eclipse shot was no accident. Andrea deliberately shadow strafed his ground guy for just that effect. That sequence from about !:05 to !:09 is the high point of the video (despite his altimeter claiming pretty much the opposite). Glider's screaming in straight towards Ground/us and check out the Doppler effect as he blows by and climbs out.

And how many of us don't have fun shadowing ground people whenever the opportunity presents itself and we have nothing better to do. But for the past week I'd been thinking that we got an incredible lucky break with Frames 22-03411 and 53-10719. Too good to be true.

But anyway... I did just last night complete my little synchro project. But brain-dead easy in theory only. In actual practice it was a major pain in the ass. Sixty seconds per minute, twenty-four frames per second. Makes the arithmetic a bit tough and one needs more than ten or fifteen smoothly functioning brain cells to keep one's head properly wrapped around the numbers.

Below we have low rez displays of 23 of my 31 glider based stills - everything useable with respect to my 33 ground baseds. They're all paired with the closest of my harvested ground shots.

The way the numbers work - using the ones above and below the second pair as the example...

10110-10107 --- 03007
Image Pair
10315-10307 --- 03018

10110-10107 - Goes with the previous pairing. Ignore.
03007 - Glider shot.
10315 - Precise corresponding frame but italicized and thus unharvested/unavailable.
10307 - Closest harvested Ground frame just before or after - in this case eight frames before.
03018 - Goes with the following pairing. Ignore.

When nothing below is italicized - as in:

10716-10715 --- 03411
Image Pair
10719-10719 --- 03417

we have a precise match. Only other example from this video is for 04014-11322.

If there's no good Ground match we skip over the Glider frames until there is. Twelve frames / Half a second off is the worst for which we've had to settle here.

02802
ImageImage
10110-10107 --- 03007
ImageImage
10315-10307 --- 03018
ImageImage
10402-10404 --- 03120
ImageImage
10504-10515 --- 03302
ImageImage
10610-10621 --- 03401
ImageImage
10709-10712 --- 03408
ImageImage
10716-10715 --- 03411
ImageImage
10719-10719 --- 03417
ImageImage
10801-10721 --- 03507
ImageImage
10815-10901 --- 03621
ImageImage
11005-11001 --- 03806
ImageImage
11114-11115 --- 04014
ImageImage
11322-11322 --- 04202
ImageImage
11510-11500 --- 04310
ImageImage
11618-11619 --- 04415
ImageImage
11723-11720 --- 04515
ImageImage
11823-11811 --- 04616
ImageImage
12000-11918 --- 04900
ImageImage
12208-12214 --- 04920
ImageImage
12304-12403 --- 05318
ImageImage
12702-12618 --- 05418
ImageImage
12802-12807 --- 05507
ImageImage
12815-12902
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9149
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Jump to next post:
http://www.kitestrings.org/post12222.html#p12222

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gP4myeTKs0U
No left turn !!
Andrea Ghidini - 2020/11/07

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gP4myeTKs0U


This is a clip from 2018, I was doing my exercises on the training hill as usual.
This particular one required to reach the trees at the end of the strip with the maximum height and a lot of VG in, than 90° right + dive than 180° left and flair.

What happened is a bit different, as I was slow (and 4/5 of VG), a tiny stream of air caused my glider to slightly turn left, since I've been too slow to recover I had to follow it and land in the parking loot....

No damage but a lesson to remeber
This one's something of an incident - even though he had a good Option B and executed real well.

About a 150 foot vertical and the air looks pretty dead. Cranks VG three times before going into B mode.

001-0000
-001 - chronological order
- 00 - seconds
- 00 - frame (30 fps)

001-0000
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614864872_46fb9bbc00_o.png
Image
002-0016
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614010583_a559481584_o.png
Image
003-0102
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614754436_0f77b602c0_o.png
Image
004-0117
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614754346_e0524d52ef_o.png
Image
005-0208
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614864457_5c32010b14_o.png
Image
006-0219
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614754181_b64bfbf86e_o.png
Image

Hook-in check.

007-0315
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614754091_30ae1a90cd_o.png
Image
008-0412
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614010118_cd2eb489d1_o.png
Image
009-0505
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614010018_d929f245e6_o.png
Image
010-0519
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614864092_4d2a25e7a5_o.png
Image

Note Ground Camera tree and her little sister from our other Andreas video - in what's the intended LZ at this point.

011-0526
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614009868_f2d49fd07f_o.png
Image
012-0608
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614863917_260bc5769b_o.png
Image
013-0620
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614863837_77ba337546_o.png
Image
014-0625
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614863737_3a358bbe44_o.png
Image

First VG pull.

015-0706
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614009418_4cd29423b2_o.png
Image
016-0712
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614009338_d0e5cc756e_o.png
Image
017-0723
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614009243_c1a9697932_o.png
Image
018-0728
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614863297_2fe8dc6a2c_o.png
Image
019-0802
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614008918_6a4efb7cc9_o.png
Image
020-0806
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614008783_519f3b341f_o.png
Image
021-0815
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614752781_3676b015c0_o.png
Image
022-0818
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614008483_d48f3d5837_o.png
Image
023-0823
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614008413_592b1c4eb7_o.png
Image
024-0828
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614862657_74e040085f_o.png
Image
025-0913
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614752366_c7c77e96a8_o.png
Image
026-0925
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614007993_ff604b58fe_o.png
Image

Second VG pull.

027-1016
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614752111_a012275c7a_o.png
Image
028-1026
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614862192_acac28766b_o.png
Image
029-1103
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614862042_94a9633ffa_o.png
Image
030-1110
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614007378_26166bc128_o.png
Image
031-1123
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614751481_963d92a9d1_o.png
Image
032-1208
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614007083_807e0cf474_o.png
Image
033-1228
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614006968_3a09da44f9_o.png
Image
034-1323
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614751141_3c454007ef_o.png
Image
035-1413
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614861237_cae8c97234_o.png
Image
036-1426
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614861147_4426a337cd_o.png
Image

Third/Final VG pull.

037-1501
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614006543_27d4aae0f7_o.png
Image
038-1505
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614006458_2c7711b9c2_o.png
Image
039-1508
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614750701_c683d513b0_o.png
Image
040-1511
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614860682_298ac92fa7_o.png
Image

Title shot's 1527 - three frames after this one. Could be that he feels that pulling VG might have been something of a distraction. (Note limp wind streamer.)

041-1524
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614750536_1ddc96457d_o.png
Image
042-1602
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614750451_8d0cddc64e_o.png
Image
043-1611
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614860472_c0859f82e5_o.png
Image
044-1623
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614860312_0bdc628da1_o.png
Image
045-1628
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614860197_b08e3b8c2a_o.png
Image
046-1711
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614860042_434f40f800_o.png
Image
047-1723
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614005563_2d0f634d9d_o.png
Image
048-1813
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614749871_c78796bdba_o.png
Image
049-1825
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614859762_38460ba6ed_o.png
Image
050-1912
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614749666_f4ffd2426d_o.png
Image
051-1928
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614749501_7d7d3e25a3_o.png
Image
052-2015
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614749341_1fcbce75a7_o.png
Image
053-2103
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614859272_47c54f2fbc_o.png
Image
054-2118
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614859142_fb4f4de260_o.png
Image

Looks like we're seeing a mild stall starting about here.

055-2221
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614004673_dae24d886d_o.png
Image
056-2308
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614858947_0167de4101_o.png
Image
057-2400
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614004528_71633e740f_o.png
Image
058-2418
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614858707_283fb8b7a9_o.png
Image
059-2508
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614004248_389722ca03_o.png
Image
060-2520
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614858447_d4ef68d9a5_o.png
Image
061-2600
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614748356_8d7330f74e_o.png
Image
062-2608
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614748191_4dfda69704_o.png
Image
063-2621
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614003788_1f38391b33_o.png
Image
064-2703
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614857987_0774f4734f_o.png
Image
065-2713
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614003503_920df74158_o.png
Image

Going to uncleat/slacken the VG here. He'd have done better to have left it on.

066-2805
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614747716_8b128ae9ac_o.png
Image
067-2807
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614003323_df35dc540f_o.png
Image
068-2812
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614747571_2f5b85076c_o.png
Image
069-2819
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614857487_b01bda0d9e_o.png
Image
070-2826
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614857377_91d299c7f7_o.png
Image
071-2911
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614747231_604af12480_o.png
Image

You can watch the line feeding back into the system fairly slowly. Applying resistance with his hand.

072-2922
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614857202_f7de9531ba_o.png
Image
073-2926
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614857082_371eac3240_o.png
Image

Note increasing sail billow.

074-3005
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614857017_8467bcb6e4_o.png
Image
075-3013
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614002543_32a9e8fe31_o.png
Image

VG line fully retracted by 3017.

076-3102
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614002303_ae2e7559f5_o.png
Image
077-3117
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614746536_0a3a3bc594_o.png
Image
078-3217
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614746426_2b65f8f61d_o.png
Image
079-3306
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614746301_a47bfe0a07_o.png
Image
080-3312
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614856257_b31715b9b3_o.png
Image

Note the real serious powerlines crossing the field diagonally SSW/NNE. (With enough monkeys with enough typewriters...) We're going to be doing pretty much all our remaining maneuvering underneath them.

081-3324
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614001628_bcd7737314_o.png
Image
082-3403
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614745996_babf689e70_o.png
Image
083-3416
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614745911_13ed26d32f_o.png
Image
084-3426
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614001343_ebbf39ffe3_o.png
Image
085-3506
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614855717_d3e1f950e4_o.png
Image

In the US banking more than five or ten degrees when below two hundred feet is near certain death. Ditto for staying prone. Just ask Joe Greblo, George Stebbins, Tom Lyon.

086-3520
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614745606_87dec3788c_o.png
Image

"No left turn !!"? Must be a bit dyslexic. The right turning we see in this one is pretty negligible.

087-3607
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614855572_1e211929f7_o.png
Image
088-3620
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614001053_41c05ea6e4_o.png
Image
089-3628
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614000988_f506f892f0_o.png
Image
090-3706
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614855337_a30fbe3ced_o.png
Image
091-3713
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614745246_2ebbd11b4f_o.png
Image
092-3721
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614745181_66a0e03cee_o.png
Image
093-3800
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614855167_6fcff01dce_o.png
Image
094-3809
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614000558_0880dc3f45_o.png
Image
095-3818
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614854962_14e189708c_o.png
Image
096-3827
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614744746_83d6d6bc9d_o.png
Image

Still prone with tons of speed.

097-3906
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614000288_2cf6bcdc2c_o.png
Image
098-3912
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614744626_fb87c8822a_o.png
Image
099-3917
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614000168_c210acbd85_o.png
Image
100-3927
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614000098_9427beecff_o.png
Image
101-4003
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614000048_65a93674f3_o.png
Image
102-4015
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614854447_58b58c31e0_o.png
Image
103-4025
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50613999913_661a9f5a58_o.png
Image
104-4105
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614744166_fbbe6ee384_o.png
Image
105-4116
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614744091_cd96db4bfa_o.png
Image
106-4125
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50613999638_d1c457c143_o.png
Image
107-4205
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614743951_600c8a73b3_o.png
Image
108-4213
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50613999448_4044207105_o.png
Image
109-4220
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614853907_fe3231402f_o.png
Image
110-4305
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614743751_b10a8b7f7e_o.png
Image

But still not the classic dead stop-on-a-dime landing flare to which we all eternally aspire. No one actually does these in the real world.

111-4314
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50614743651_38f0ed3db9_o.png
Image

This is a run-out.

112-4325
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50613999173_ee0b214ed8_o.png
Image
113-4407
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50613999068_915d6da489_o.png
Image
114-4416
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50613999028_36021c422c_o.png
Image

Ninety-nine percent of our training from Day One on is gearing us for being able to safely land in a narrow dry riverbed with large rocks strewn all over the place. But the approach to the narrow dry riverbed with large rocks strewn all over the place is always assumed to be taking place in one of the Happy Acres putting greens that virtually all hang gliders actually use for LZs. And all of our approach training is to NEVER do ANYTHING we see Andrea doing here from about 052-2015 on.

Jump to top:
http://www.kitestrings.org/post12145.html#p12145
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9149
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.shga.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=6186
2020 Summary
Rob Burgis - 2021/01/18 18:36:57 UTC

2020 was a tough year for obvious reasons. However, our club continued to operate safely by adopting a few safety measures. Improvements to our LZ and launch include:

- Overshoot hill reduction - The LZ overshoot hill is almost flat and reductions will continue until it is. Originally, the overshoot was built up to give people a chance to land on top instead of in the boulder-strewn wash. Since then, the wash has been cleared and the dirt plateau where the grass ends has been extended to the east. Any pilots who believe that they might overshoot are asked to stay on the far-left side of the dirt plateau. This way, if an overshoot occurs, they will be in alignment with the long and smooth wash LZ.
I don't understand any of this.

- Kagel's a site for Threes and sponsored supervised Twos closing on their Threes in benign conditions. A Three is certified to be able land safely, smoothly, on his feet, in control within a fifty foot radius of a spot consistently in any sane conditions.

- The LZ is a meticulously groomed Happy Acres putting green with a virtually unlimited and unobstructed approach. One could easily go onto final literally a mile out if one felt like it.

- Your pilots are virtually all Greblo products. And Greblo and his products...

16-031309
http://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4348/37169463766_6f13e0b9fe_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4404/37169461186_9df24d6ff9_o.png
23-075124

...are the best of the best when it comes to safe landings. None of them are permitted to go anywhere near their control tubes connector bar until they're over fifty hours or within thirty hours of their Threes - whichever comes last.

And you have pilots who BELIEVE they MIGHT overshoot? I find this totally baffling. And even if they did - a boulder-strewn wash should never present the slightest issue for anyone. We train for XC and the boulder-strewn wash is what keeps us alive, safe, happy. A truly competent and responsible XC pilot never ventures out of brain-dead easy range of one.

As a matter o' fact - with all due respect to Greblo and Grebloville pilots - what you SHOULD doing is mandating a monthly landing in the boulder-strewn wash to maintain currency and validity of ratings. And really top notch pilots should be doing ALL their landings in the boulder-strewn wash.

And you're talking about CLEARING boulders, replacing them with dirt, advising landings on long, smooth, level terrain? Hell, why not just increase radii for spot landings, eliminate the hang check and try to skate by with hook-in checks, make AT releases more easily reachable, go to straight pin barrel releases, put everybody up on three point bridles, use weak links that only increase the safety of the towing operation one out of three pulls...

What a bunch o' fags. The sport has no future whatsoever.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9149
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=37049
Possible the Greatest Flying moment of my flying career
NMERider - 2021/05/17 23:30:53 UTC

Well, your TBI rehabilitation helped at least one other pilot who, along with his wife, benefited from your sister's knowledge of TBI recovery. In fact I ran into him and his wife just two days ago after not seeing either for perhaps five years. The world is populated with a certain portion of individuals who find their meaning through the infliction of misery onto others for no good reason. These people should be ignored until they implode from lack of stimulation that comes from being sadistic or intolerant. Your presence on this forum serves as a reminder to not let one's guard down and be caught unprepared. Enough members of the Org have been killed or permanently injured in the sport as it is.
Well, your TBI rehabilitation helped at least one other pilot who, along with his wife, benefited from your sister's knowledge of TBI recovery.
Here's a thought... Don't put yourself into a situation in which you're gonna need to benefit from anyone's knowledge of TBI recovery. And from what I'm seeing TBI recovery is a lot like the attainment of perfected flare timing - doesn't actually exist in the real world.
In fact I ran into him and his wife just two days ago after not seeing either for perhaps five years.
So I'm guessing he's not actually a pilot anymore. Hasn't been for a long time and won't ever be again. Another imperfectly timed flare?
The world is populated with a certain portion of individuals who find their meaning through the infliction of misery onto others for no good reason.
We refer to these individuals as "hang glider pilots". The Jack and Davis Shows were oozing with them - back in the day before those rags dropped below the critical mass required for any pretense of discussion.
These people should be ignored until they implode from lack of stimulation that comes from being sadistic or intolerant.
The implosions happened years ago.
Your presence on this forum serves as a reminder...
...as to what can happen when one is geared for executing stupid stunt landings in real world conditions.
...to not let one's guard down and be caught unprepared.
If you're upright at thirty feet with your hands on the control tubes at shoulder or ear height your guard can be through the ceiling and you're still gonna be totally unprepared. And tell me what training he had to better prepare him for the circumstances of his last approach 2010/03/28? If we had a time machine that would beam him back to ten seconds before things went irrevocably south what would we advise him to do differently to attain better results?

And I'll tell ya one thing... NOBODY's guard is down thirty feet over the field late on final - regardless of conditions.

And by the way... How much presence on this forum do any of his instructors and ratings officials have. If a product ends up in the shape Chris did don't the douchebags who certified him as being good to go in the relevant environment have some degree of responsibility regarding the outcome? Tell me when an instructor has ever been held accountable for anything beyond failing to hook a first time "student" into the glider for her tandem "discovery" flight. I can think of ONE example. Steve Parson for launching Marvin Trudeau into a situation over his head on 2010/08/18. But that was only after he'd dropped an unhooked tandem thrill rider.
Enough members of the Org have been killed or permanently injured in the sport as it is.
Enough? With crud like Karl Allmendinger and Paul Hurless still viable I'd say not anywhere near enough.

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=25536
Whoops! Snapped another tip wand :-O
NMERider - 2012/03/14 15:43:09 UTC

I refuse to come in with both hands on the downtubes ever again. I have had some very powerful thermals and gusts kick off and lost control of the glider due to hands on the DTs. I prefer both hands on the control bar all the way until trim and ground effect. I have been lifted right off the deck in the desert and carried over 150 yards.

I like what Steve Pearson does when he comes in and may adapt something like that.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27086
Steve Pearson on landings
Steve Pearson - 2012/03/28 23:26:05 UTC

I can't control the glider in strong air with my hands at shoulder or ear height and I'd rather land on my belly with my hands on the basetube than get turned downwind.
That's EXACTLY what happened to Chris. Not to mention, in the fatal category:

2004/06/23 - Ljubomir Tomaskovic - Millau
2008/06/21 - Richard Seymour - Kagel
2014/09/29 - Joe Julik - Whitewater
2017/09/04 - Mark Henline - Golden
2017/12/30 - Emma Martin - Forbes

And you name me ONE instructor who teaches students how to safely execute an approach in real world conditions. And after you're unable to do that tell me how we SHOULD be bringing people into the sport and qualifying them to fly anything beyond Dockweiler and Kagel sleds.

And that's what Steve Pearson says and does but that's not how he tells us how to land the gliders he designs and sells in his owners manuals. The way he tells us to land his gliders in his owners manuals is in alignment with what his dealers are teaching to land gliders - which is total crap.

And do make sure that whatever you come up with is in alignment with the strategy of your local coffee shop owner...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=12682
Landing on your feet (for AEROTOW)- So Dangerous
Jack Axaopoulos - 2009/06/29 14:26:26 UTC

OMG!!! You dont even have wheels!!?!?!?!? Image
YOURE GONNA DIE FOR SUUUUREE!!!! Image
Image
I have a brilliant idea. People who cant land for sh*t.... LEARN TO LAND Image That way when a weak link breaks on you, ITS A NON-ISSUE. Genius huh??? Image
...for promoting the sport of hang gliding - an activity in which he himself hasn't participated in a decade and a half.

And doing so won't be that easy now seeing as how he's...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=22212
So long guys
Jack Axaopoulos - 2011/06/12 18:20:06 UTC

Well I see now that you are threatening to delete your account in a PM if I dont delete it for you, which I can only assume means youre going to do what a certain other poster did and start vandalizing and deleting posts, so you force my hand... account banned so you cant vandalize. Well this truly sucks. Threatening to damage the site just because you got pissed off is really messed up dude. You need to seriously chill out.
...vandalized the historical record by deleting all of his posts and everything he basemented - not to mention putting "Incident Reports" off limits to non members plus members the motherfucker's banned for having the integrity to call him out.
I refuse to come in with both hands on the downtubes ever again.
Yeah, you could die. But since u$hPa...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25321
Stop the Stupids at the USHPA BOD meeting
Mark G. Forbes - 2011/09/29 02:26:23 UTC

We can establish rules which we think will improve pilot safety, but our attorney is right. USHPA is not in the business of keeping pilots "safe" and it can't be. Stepping into that morass is a recipe for extinction of our association. I wish it were not so, but it is. We don't sell equipment, we don't offer instruction, and we don't assure pilots that they'll be safe. Even so, we get sued periodically by people who say we "shoulda, coulda, woulda" done something that would have averted their accident.

It's not just concern for meet directors and policy makers...it's about our continued existence as an association. It's about minimizing the chance of our getting sued out of existence. We're one lawsuit away from that, all the time, and we think hard about it. I would LOVE to not have to think that way, but every time a legal threat arises, it reminds me that we have a very dysfunctional legal system in this country (note: not a "justice" system...there's little justice involved) and we have to recognize that reality and deal with it.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27736
Increase in our USHpA dues
Mark G. Forbes - 2012/12/20 06:21:33 UTC

There are also numerous legal issues associated with accident reports, which we're still wrestling with. It's a trade-off between informing our members so they can avoid those kinds of accidents in the future, and exposing ourselves to even more lawsuits by giving plaintiff's attorneys more ammunition to shoot at us.

Imagine a report that concludes, "If we'd had a procedure "x" in place, then it would have probably prevented this accident. And we're going to put that procedure in place at the next BOD meeting." Good info, and what we want to be able to convey. But what comes out at trial is, "Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, my client suffered injury because USHPA knew or should have known that a safety procedure was not in place, and was therefore negligent and at fault." We're constantly walking this line between full disclosure and handing out nooses at the hangmen's convention.
...isn't in the safety business but rather in the business of sucking as much money as possible for as long as possible from its ever and rapidly shrinking membership their instructors teach NOTHING BUT how to come in safely - at Grebloville starting from two thousand feet - with both hands on the downtubes. Joe handles the related problems by burying the fatality reports.

If we really wanna benefit pilots - in the US and it's satellite countries - we steer the ones who haven't already survived the instructional system up to Three or Four level away from hang gliding 'cause there's very little chance that they'll be able to operate in anything better than luck mode.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9149
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27086
Steve Pearson on landings
Steve Pearson - 2012/03/28 23:26:05 UTC

I wouldn't presume to teach others how to land but for me the challenge is having precise control of the glider before flare. The flare window is really long on a T2, maybe 2 seconds or 50 ft, but I can't initiate pitch unless the wings are level and the glider isn't yawed (you can see the result in the landing video, I start thinking about avoiding Joe, the glider yaws almost imperceptibly and I drop a wing). Landing straight is easy in smooth or dead air but sometimes requires every bit of control authority that I can manage if the LZ is breaking off or if I have to maneuver late on approach. I always have plenty of pitch authority and don't grip the downtubes because it only takes a light push to get the nose up. I can't control the glider in strong air with my hands at shoulder or ear height and I'd rather land on my belly with my hands on the basetube than get turned downwind.

My other comment is that I like to make a long low final. I can flare more aggressively from close to the ground, I don't have to worry about mushing through a gradient and I'm only arresting forward motion. Try jumping off a chair and running--your feet are planted to the ground. I guess that's one reason why Greblo teaches students to flare gradually and run out their landings.
I wouldn't presume to teach others how to land...
No, that certainly wouldn't fall under the purview of the world's foremost glider designer since the beginning of time. (And one wonders whom it is who writes the Wills Wing glider owners manuals which instruct the pilots on how to land them.) That's obviously the job of a new Three who's just completed one of u$hPa's Instructor Certification Programs - which have absolutely nothing to do with standardizing procedures which keep the student pilot safe - so he can work the summer at Lockout Mountain Flight Park.

So whom WOULD you recommend for teaching others how to land? Greblo? Who teaches total crap which flatly contradicts the material in your owners manuals and supresses fatal Kagel landing incident reports?

And now you're President of the United States Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association - the organization which establishes SOPs; the rating standards you use as recommendations for qualifications to fly your intro, recreational, comp bladewing gliders; qualifies instructors and other ratings officials. So you're still not presuming to teach others how to land?

No, wait... Tim Herr determined that u$hPa wasn't and couldn't be in the safety business. So I guess it doesn't matter how many of your customers get turned downwind and mangled or killed because they had their hands where Greblo teaches them to have them for the entire duration of a Kagel flight - 'cept then you won't be able to sell them any more gliders and u$hPa won't ever have them as members. And if they're killed u$hPa will immediately erase their records as previous members.

The reason you wouldn't presume to teach others how to land is 'cause if you did you'd be contradicting the total crap 100.0 percent of your dealers teach their victims how to land. So you've figured you'll do better mangling and killing people at the accustomed rate rather then pissing off your dealers and having them dump Wills and go with Moyes and North Wing.
...but for me...
Yeah, that's for YOU. But your gliders would be able to sense that it's not you under the wing and would likely behave in entirely different manners.
...the challenge...
If there's a "CHALLENGE" this is something no halfway intelligent individual has any fuckin' business doing. If it's a challenge then we're gonna fail five or ten percent of the time. And those failures of control can (and do) easily translate to crippling and fatal consequences. Ask Orion Price if you don't believe me.
...is having precise control of the glider before flare.
EX fuckin' ZACTLY. 'Cause once you execute the flare you have ZILCH control of the glider and are along for the ride - hoping the air won't be doing anything substantially uncooperative until after the glider completes its whipstall and drops you to a dead stop down on the runway. And how 'bout you show us the videos of your gliders passing certification for safe control during that phase.
The flare window is really long on a T2, maybe 2 seconds or 50 ft...
...assuming the air will be cooperating for the duration of that period...
...but I can't initiate pitch...
INITIATE pitch? Shouldn't a competent pilot be constantly CONTROLLING pitch until his plane is down and rolling on the runway?
...unless the wings are level...
And what better way is there to keep the wings level than to rotate to upright and place your hands on the control tubes at shoulder or ear height.
...and the glider isn't yawed...
Tell me how the glider's gonna yaw. Never mind, I'll do it. The only whay it's gonna yaw is if it encounters a substantial crosswind. And if the glider yaws into a crosswind then you let it. On the rare occasion when you're not landing in a narrow dry riverbed with large rocks strewn all over the place anyway.
...(you can see the result in the landing video...
Not anymore, you pulled it. Similar to the way you pulled all your owners manuals off line. And we should be thinking about just how much we should be able to trust anyone who pulls shit like that.
I start thinking about avoiding Joe...
I started thinking about avoiding Joe a decade ago. And if I'd known him way better I'd have started thinking about avoiding him a lot sooner.
...the glider yaws almost imperceptibly and I drop a wing).
And here I was thinking that the glider is supposed to have a pilot at the controls telling it what to do. But I guess when you stall the wing the glider isn't gliding and is therefore no longer gliding. It's gone from being a glider to being a staller. And thus the pilot is no longer a pilot 'cause there's extremely little he can do inside of however many seconds he has left.
Landing straight is easy in smooth or dead air but sometimes requires every bit of control authority that I can manage if the LZ is breaking off...
But fear not. Mother Nature will never be able to throw anything at us which will overwhelm the control authority we can manage. And if she even thinks about trying then we just shift our hands to the control tubes at shoulder or ear height such that our control authority instantly becomes near infinite.
...or if I have to maneuver late on approach.
And we'll always have at least 1.5 times the minimal energry needed to safely maneuver late on approach. That's one of the many advantages hang gliders have over conventional fixed wing aircraft - which the FAA mandates not to maneuver late on approach.
I always have plenty of pitch authority...
1. 'Cause you don't ever get lulled - or feel any effects dropping down into a gradient.

2. Bullshit. We're supposed to be losing control authority near the end of our landing sequence. And if you have plenty of control authority then you're not landing.
...and don't grip the downtubes because it only takes a light push to get the nose up.
And here I was thinking that our nose should be coming down as the landing progresses. Guess I've been spending too much time hanging around airports.
I can't control the glider in strong air with my hands at shoulder or ear height...
Like you have them:

15-2106
Image

here? Thanks zillions for the demonstration of the kind of dangerous shit one can get away with in overcast dead conditions.
...and I'd rather land on my belly with my hands on the basetube than get turned downwind.
'Specially without wheels or skids. What's the worst that could happen? Certainly nothing like a broken wrist or quading.
My other comment is that I like to make a long low final.
'Cause you're a SoCal guy who does 99.99 percent of his landings at Crestline - and can't begin to imagine what it would be like to come into a tight field on an eastern XC flight. Me? I think only douchebags execute long low finals.

67-11720 - 32-04415
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50595339053_a94fc18d5c_o.png
Image

I'd be bored outta my fuckin' skull.
I can flare more aggressively from close to the ground...
If you're close to the ground near the end of a long low final then why do you NEED to flare aggressively? And don't tell me it's 'cause you're preparing yourself for emergency landing situations - 'cause if you were you wouldn't be doing long low finals.
I don't have to worry about mushing through a gradient...
Nobody has to worry about mushing through a gradient. If one is mushing through a gradient one of two things will happen. He'll either:
- stall
- pull in to prevent a stall
...and I'm only arresting forward motion.
No you're not. You're also initiating upward motion. And what could be the possible harm in that?
Try jumping off a chair and running--your feet are planted to the ground.
1. Yeah right, Steve. Coming in in light or dead air and running your glider to a stop is exactly like jumping off a chair and running. Never a pretty sight. (This is total fucking lunacy.)

2. Feet planted to the ground...

15-2106
Image

Hold that thought.
I guess that's one reason why Greblo teaches students to flare gradually and run out their landings.
1. You GUESS? You guys seem to be on such intimate terms...

34-3511
Image

...I'm rather astonished you don't KNOW.

2. He's teaching One and Two levels. Do you think they need to be guessing about what he's trying to accomlish with all the bullshit he's teaching?

3. And here I was thinking that hang glider landing training was geared from Day One to enable the student to stop safely in a narrow dry riverbed with large rocks strewn all over the place. What happens when one attempts to flare gradually and run out his landing in an environment like that? He seems to be assuming that his students will be ending all their high flights in the Kagel and Crestline LZs.

4. How 'bout:

16-031309
http://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4348/37169463766_6f13e0b9fe_o.png
Image

What the fuck is he trying to teach/accomplish with that bullshit? Are his products world renowned for their superior approach and...

32-1901
Image

...spot landing skills?

http://vimeo.com/39102874

Pearson whacks Greblo

Yeah Steve, I'm starting to get a feel for the multiple reasons you'd want that video pulled from the historical record.
Steven Pearson - 2012/03/24 10:51

Landing sequence from the 2009 Crestline fly-in. About 30 feet away from the cone, I realized that Joe was standing his ground and tried to avoid clipping him in the head with my basetube. Thanks to Kenny Westfall.
The video's dead and so is the guy who shot it - as of 2020/10/04 21:00 PDT. Vicinity of Lake Arrowhead, single vehicle.

01-0000
- 01 - chronological order
- 00 - seconds
- 00 - frame (15 fps)

01-0000
Image

Here we need to start asking ourselves why Greblo has parked himself almost precisely centered on the point Steve - or at least someone flying a state-of-the-art topless bladewing - will be planning to stop his glider.

02-0007
Image
03-0304
Image
04-0507
Image
05-0612
Image
06-0709
Image

Going onto final at about ten percent of the altitude a responsible pilot would've completed is final turn. Setting an extremely poor example there, Steve.

07-0810
Image
08-1004
Image

FINALLY...

09-1209
Image
10-1500
Image
11-1705
Image
12-1908
Image
13-2008
Image

Right hand up on the downtube at ear height.

14-2014
Image

Left hand... And after this point Steve becomes little more than a passenger on a nearly stalled wing. And the wing doesn't give a rat's ass about who designed it.

15-2106
Image

And Joe hasn't budged either foot a millimeter since we first saw him back at 01-0000 - and won't until after 24-2303.

And note the glider starting to yaws almost imperceptibly. I'd have never picked up on that if Steve hadn't pointed that out in his post. I guess if that can happen to a pilot as experienced and accomplished as Steve is that helpless to prevent our own gliders from yaws almost imperceptibly.

16-2113
Image
17-2204
Image

If only there were some way to get that wing flying again.

18-2208
Image

And both of Joe's feet still planted. And this is the guy we want teaching and signing off our Ones, Twos, Threes?

19-2212
Image
20-2214
Image
21-2300
Image

Don't worry, Joe. Steve still has tons of clearance between where you've planted your feet and he's gonna stop in a worst case scenario.

22-2301
Image

Notice that Pearson doesn't actually whack Greblo - despite the title of the video.

23-2302
Image

Don't worry, Joe. Doesn't hold a candle to what you set your students up for. And Steve wouldn't presume to teach others how to land. He's totally thrilled with the way you've been doing it since the beginning of time - starting at his own private stretch of California beach a wee bit south of LAX.

24-2303
Image
25-2310
Image

How 'bout presuming to teach others where not to stand when observing gliders landing? Would you be good with presuming that much?

26-2401
Image
27-2409
Image
28-2504
Image
29-2700
Image
30-2808
Image
31-2913
Image
32-3007
Image
33-3107
Image

Weird.

34-3511
Image
Sorry
This video does not exist.
But now the stills do. Guess you and your buddy can start being a bit less sorry.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9149
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://vimeo.com/39102874
Pearson whacks Greblo

Yeah Steve, I'm starting to get a feel for the multiple reasons you'd want that video pulled from the historical record.
Steven Pearson - 2012/03/24 10:51

Landing sequence from the 2009 Crestline fly-in. About 30 feet away from the cone, I realized that Joe was standing his ground and tried to avoid clipping him in the head with my basetube.
Standing HIS ground?

16-2113
Image

Lemme familiarize you with the regs for AJX:

http://crestlinesoaring.org/andy-jackson-airpark/
Andy Jackson Airpark - Crestline Soaring Society
Spectators, Children, & Pets
Spectators are limited to parking area and the spectator area as identified on the Site Layout Diagram. Spectators are not allowed in the HG or PG breakdown area, landing zone or around the training hills.
He wasn't standing HIS ground. He was standing YOURS. He wasn't even a goddam SPECTATOR. He was out there deliberately interfering with your landing; occupying the spot everyone and his dog knew was your intended stopping point; causing you to compromise your landing - come down starboard wingtip first, drop down on your control frame, beak; not budging a single inch until after contact was made.

Was this supposed to be some kind of joke?

- I didn't find it terribly amusing. Hell, I've never found anything that's come out of Greblo amusing, clever, useful, competent.

- If it WERE supposed to be some kind of joke then how come you:

-- have never acknowledged that anywhere? Ditto for Joe, the guy behind the camera, any other participant in the 2009 Crestline fly-in.

-- pulled this masterpiece of hang gliding humor off line without comment?

- The video is referenced in the first of a 29 post 16 participant (which doesn't include Greblo) Davis Show thread and nobody expresses the least hint of amusement.

Doesn't sound like Joe's a great buddy off yours. Also doesn't sound like he's a great buddy of ANYONE - or anything but another parasite milking the sport for all he can get out of it. And that includes co-opting a California State Park resource (Dockweiler) to use as his private training facility - à la Kitty Hawk Kites at Jockey's Ridge, Air California Adventure at Torrey, (the late) Highland Aerosports at Ridgely.

AVOID clipping him in the head with your basetube? What a massively wasted opportunity. Name one other instance from the entire world history of the sport in which a glider's needed to maneuver and/or compromise a landing to avoid clipping so much as a garden variety wuffo in the head with his basetube. Me? I'd have stayed down in ground effect until I'd either smacked that motherfucker or bellied in normally after he'd decided he was no longer interested in playing his little game.

Compare/Contrast John Heiney, Ryan Voight, yourself. All of you are accomplished flyers. John and Ryan are top notch aero guys who've done cool stuff with photography, you've done a lot with glider design and innovation. That counts for SOMETHING. Joe's just moved things ever backwards to help him suck personal income out of the sport.
Post Reply