Search found 155 matches
- 2017/10/07 18:42:12 UTC
- Forum: General
- Topic: The Bob Show
- Replies: 1107
- Views: 5649121
Re: The Bob Show
By saying "...Jonathan claims to have already seen it...", you inferred he claimed to have seen Shannon's case file. Careful, you don't want "to make accusations without facts". He claims to have seen the material USHPA made available on their web site. I don't know if that was ...
- 2017/10/07 18:22:58 UTC
- Forum: General
- Topic: The Bob Show
- Replies: 1107
- Views: 5649121
Re: The Bob Show
It is a bit odd that you don't already have a copy. It was my first (and still only) time as an expert witness. I was also in the middle of my own "Trial of the Century" restraining order trial from November to March. Expert witnesses are not the client, and I didn't even know about the s...
- 2017/10/07 17:42:44 UTC
- Forum: General
- Topic: The Bob Show
- Replies: 1107
- Views: 5649121
Re: The Bob Show
You are not believable even today because Shannon's case file is public record and a copy of the entire case can be obtained for $40.00 from the San Diego Courthouse where it is stored. Sounds like a cheap price if it only shuts up one of you. It is a cheap price, and I'll be following up on it. Th...
- 2017/10/07 16:52:32 UTC
- Forum: General
- Topic: The Bob Show
- Replies: 1107
- Views: 5649121
Re: The Bob Show
The case was settled by the insurance company(s) and not by USHPA, Torrey et al.. ... You were not a believable witness [blah blah blah] Is that the story USHPA spreads to continue fleecing the membership? My testimony stood on its own and stands on its own. They had a P0 and a P1 in the air at a s...
- 2017/10/07 16:01:08 UTC
- Forum: General
- Topic: Breaking USHPA's Monopoly Control of Flying Sites
- Replies: 135
- Views: 91434
Doing the Math
We are making progress, and Dockweiler is a good sign. Didn't answer my question about how many individuals were needed/used to achieve that victory. Sorry. I missed it. It took 3 of us willing to actually go to the meetings (some of which were not public). But that's not the question. The question...
- 2017/10/07 07:26:48 UTC
- Forum: General
- Topic: The Bob Show
- Replies: 1107
- Views: 5649121
Re: The Bob Show
There's a saying that if you have to explain a joke, then you haven't told it right. My credibility and my testimony was and is solid as a rock. You told that joke right, Bob. I have to give you credit for putting those lines together. It was very clever. But your cleverness has no bearing on my cr...
- 2017/10/07 05:42:15 UTC
- Forum: General
- Topic: The Bob Show
- Replies: 1107
- Views: 5649121
Re: The Bob Show
My, my, my. Look at all the sudden interest in the precise use of the English language. There's a saying that if you have to explain a joke, then you haven't told it right. The meaning of written words is equivalent to the concepts that they convey to those who read them. No more and no less. The a...
- 2017/10/07 05:15:31 UTC
- Forum: General
- Topic: Breaking USHPA's Monopoly Control of Flying Sites
- Replies: 135
- Views: 91434
Re: Breaking USHPA's Monopoly Control of Flying Sites
The American Indians lost their continent because they were so busy trying to one-up their fellow tribes that they could never really unite ... at least not until it was way too late. We are making progress, and Dockweiler is a good sign. But USHPA's monoply is very strong. The outcome is not clear....
- 2017/10/07 04:20:53 UTC
- Forum: General
- Topic: The Bob Show
- Replies: 1107
- Views: 5649121
Re: The Bob Show
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witness_impeachment Bob, Your credibility as a witness was impeached due to bias and undoubtedly other things. My credibility and my testimony was and is solid as a rock. You can play word games if you want, but you're only impeaching your own credibility. You are inten...
- 2017/10/07 02:45:45 UTC
- Forum: General
- Topic: The Bob Show
- Replies: 1107
- Views: 5649121
Re: The Bob Show
Jonathan, Here is the applicable definition of "impeach" from http://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/impeach#English To demonstrate in court that a testimony under oath contradicts another testimony from the same person, usually one taken during deposition. Now there can also be an interpretation...